Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InduSoft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Invensys. MBisanz ^talk 17:24, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

InduSoft[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG. A quick google search reveals that most of the little coverage this company has got is for its products.. And article reads like a promotion. Think this should be deleted. Regards —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 14:22, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 14:24, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 14:24, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 14:24, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as although News, Books, browser and Highbeam all found links, there's nothing to suggest better yet. SwisterTwister talk 07:20, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:20, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - to parent company Invensys or Schneider Electric. Software company article of unclear notability, lacking independent references apart from a routine announcement of the acquisition. A search turned up more coverage of the acquisition in automation world and press releases related to their 'InduSoft Web Studio' product, but no significant coverage not about the acquisition. Parent companies are notable so a redirect is reasonable. Dialectric (talk) 04:49, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:13, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.