Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indoxicarb
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Keep as redirect. No need to debate for five days over what has been shown to be a plausible typo. Non-admin closure. Itub (talk) 08:43, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Indoxicarb[edit]
- Indoxicarb (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete nn pesticide; only 246 ghits. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:04, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete.No sources or references cited to indicate notability. GoogleBooks gives zero hits[1] and GoogleScholar gives only 8 hits [2]. Fails WP:N. Nsk92 (talk) 21:53, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Changing to Redirect to Indoxacarb, per comments below. Seems to be a plausible misspelling. Nsk92 (talk) 02:11, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per search for secondary sources already done by Nsk92 (talk · contribs), lack of significant coverage in independent secondary sources. Cirt (talk) 22:36, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect. There is no such thing as an nn pesticide. All chemical compounds are notable, and stubs are useful. But I think this is a spelling mistake, which would account for the lack of ghits. Redirect to Indoxacarb. --23:16, 12 May 2008 (UTC)The preceding comment was added by User:Eastmain who seems to have used 5 ~'s instead of 4. Perhaps appropriate in an AfD resulting from a misspelling. Nsk92 (talk) 02:16, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as redirect to Indoxacarb as performed by Eastmain. Redirects are cheap, and misspelling is plausible. Deor (talk) 01:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Deor. Stifle (talk) 19:14, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.