Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indo-Nepal Remittance Facility Scheme

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 00:56, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indo-Nepal Remittance Facility Scheme[edit]

Indo-Nepal Remittance Facility Scheme (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Current article has two references, both to banking sites which simply explain the procedure. The procedure exists, but a News search turned up zero. Other searches turn up hits, since it is a term, but nothing substantial to denote notability. Onel5969 TT me 15:24, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - notability not established. At first I thought that maybe this could be merged to India-Nepal relations, but on second thought it does not seem important enough even for that.--Staberinde (talk) 15:54, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 20:31, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 20:31, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 20:32, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I suppose unless it can actually mentioned elsewhere as my searches found nothing explicitly better aside from this, this and this. SwisterTwister talk 22:15, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.