Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Individual server rules in Four Square

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 February 19.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete as an unsourced game guide. Eluchil404 21:27, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Individual server rules in Four Square[edit]

Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, it is entirely unsourced and appears to be original research. Chunky Rice 02:37, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I moved it over from the original Four Square page as it was cluttering it up. As for WP:NFT, we've been deleting any list item that was obviously written in from a student in school. You might want to make a note of this deletion nomination on Four Square and/or Talk:Four Square as well to let the regular users know. How long do we have to find sources if an article is put on the delete list? --Goldrushcavi 04:40, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Can these rules be attributed to somewhere? Corpx 05:29, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Wikipedia not being a game guide. The important bits can be merged in the main article, the vast majority of this is playgroundcruft. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:25, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rules do not qualify under the game guide thing - Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rules_of_chess Corpx 17:06, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This goes a bit beyond rules. Basic overview rules are at the Four square article. This definitely gets into game guide territory. -Chunky Rice 17:10, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It should be trimmed a little then, not completely deleted. Unlike the chess rules, this is completely unsourced though Corpx 17:13, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.