Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indigo (Maad Moiselle EP)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:12, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indigo (Maad Moiselle EP)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very weakly sourced promotional article. No evidence of notability. Logical Cowboy (talk) 14:29, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 15:18, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't find it specially promotional, and many articles start off undersourced. Is the subject notable, encyclopedic? I tend to think it is. Spicemix (talk) 08:02, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Reply There was no evidence of notability. That is why I nominated it. If you can provide some evidence of notability, please go ahead. BTW WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a good argument at AfD. Logical Cowboy (talk) 16:32, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I just don't see the point of knocking a little hole in WP so the half dozen or so people a day who are interested can't find this information so easily. Spicemix (talk) 17:06, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reply WP:INTERESTING is not a good argument at AfD either. Logical Cowboy (talk) 21:54, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a non-notable release by a non-notable artist whose article is very likely to be deleted soon. –Chase (talk / contribs) 02:51, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NALBUM, no significant coverage. I agree with editor Chase above. --Bejnar (talk) 11:28, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails all criteria of WP:NALBUM. Lacks significant coverage by independent reliable sources. Artist's page has been deleted. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.