Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indiana's NewsCenter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:19, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indiana's NewsCenter[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Arrangement effectively defunct, brand hasn't even been used on-air anymore (loose group of stations that have shared news programming at some point in time) ViperSnake151 Talk 18:22, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:27, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:27, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:27, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:27, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:42, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I was against this article ever being created, but at the time the concept of one news operation running on two Big Three stations was unique in 2006 and needed some elaboration. Now, it's pretty much a standard operating procedure in local TV news for middling markets in 2016. The article is basically a textwall of information that has nothing to do with the INN arrangement at all (like ratings, cancelled TV shows and a bunch of industry corporate-speak the average reader doesn't care about), and could easily be conveyed in much shorter form on the individual WPTA-TV and WISE-TV articles. Nate • (chatter) 04:25, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; there's little-to-nothing significant enough about this now-defunct joint news operation to merit its own article. I would not necessarily be opposed to a redirect to WPTA § News operation, though. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:20, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.