Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian relativity
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 03:10, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Indian relativity[edit]
Indian relativity - delete - I want this deleted as the phrase is not notable in the field of relativity theory or well-known in popular culture. It doesn't meet WP standards. MP (talk) 19:38, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. In fact, the phrase is not even mentioned in the reference given. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 02:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. -- Agεθ020 (ΔT • ФC) 02:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There's been a bunch of articles lately that are Indian perspectives on otherwise notable general theories (there was an Indian Impressionism article a while back, don't know if it is still around). Articles that provide no further details about a general thing by adding the perspective of a culture, race or country should not be included. •Elomis• 02:53, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete yup. Missvain 04:00, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Aryabhata's observation is not a statement of the principle of relativity. Instead it is an observation made later and independently by Copernicus. Kindly note that noone credits Copernicus with discovering the principle of relativity. --EMS | Talk 05:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - unverifiable, 25 non-wiki ghits. MER-C 05:29, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, WP:V, does this really exist? --Terence Ong (C | R) 08:01, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- See Aryabhata's relativity principle, which is the genesis of this business (and also up for deletion). However, the simple answer in "No". --EMS | Talk 21:07, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete agree with nom & ems57fcva.SkierRMH 09:15, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. utcursch | talk 11:58, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not verified, and fails WP:NEO.-- danntm T C 17:52, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- Somebody has coined two words just for a fun .Good coinage! But no need in this wikipedia.There is no so called popular theory . I have heard of Aryabhatas theory of relativity. Nileena joseph (Talk|Contribs) 16:35, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. See also ongoing Afd on Aryabhata's relativity principle. Pavel Vozenilek 02:35, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.