Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Hills, California

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 04:56, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Hills, California[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've been doing these one at a time, but it would speed things up considerably to deal with as many of the subdivisions added to GNIS from "Welcome to Calaveras County and Western Alpine County" or a similar map from the same company as I can manage. I can sort of see why they were added, but the fact remains that these are all non-notable subdivisions. Mangoe (talk) 03:15, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Others of the same ilk in this nomination:

Mangoe (talk) 03:44, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 05:17, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 05:17, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Mangoe's research is, as always, thorough; none of these qualify as communities. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:21, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all Mass-produced without regard for WP:N or WP:V. Subdivisions fail WP:GEOLAND#2 without significant coverage. Recreation with sources beyond GNIS and mirror that establishes sigcov may be done. Reywas92^Talk 06:37, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom --Devokewater 09:59, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all: None of them are notable communties. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 10:52, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Good catch, Mangoe. Delete all these as not notable. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:55, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom. Nika2020 (talk) 18:12, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom, good job Mangoe. –dlthewave ☎ 20:25, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. Mass produced junk. Nothing notable. Glendoremus (talk) 23:45, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: What I don't like about mass nominations is the risk that some of these may be notable. Let's recall Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fort Ann, California where the nominator here proposed it as a test run for mass deletion, and then that article was KEPT.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 21:05, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.