Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Independent National Socialism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted, WP:SNOW. Gwen Gale (talk) 21:35, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Independent National Socialism[edit]

Promotional piece for Stormfront (website). The term "Independent National Socialism" gets 7 g-hits, one of which is from Stormfront and the other six of which are derived from Wikipedia. All of the sources in this article are from Stormfront and about half of them are direct quotations of some guy's message board post on the forum. This is a promotional piece for a non-notable philosophy. -- B (talk) 12:51, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per WP:V. No evidence that this is a recognized philosophy. Pburka (talk) 13:17, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable, and seemingly the view of one stormfront forum poster. No sources that mention the philosophy apart from those from stormfront, and in particular from the forum posts of a single user. As per nom, no sources revealed by google search apart from those from Wikipedia, and those from a stormfront forum post. No google news hits, or on the blog search, or google groups, or google scholar. Similar results for yahoo search, and at dogpile. Only 3 hits at google books, one of which definitely unrelated, and the others don't appear to be. Silverfish (talk) 13:25, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable, non-verifiable due to no reliable sources - a forum posting is actually used as a cite. Looks to be promoting this organisation. -Toon⁰⁵ 16:42, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doing a google search, I couldn't find any reliable third party sources, seperate of the topic, to verify the informationj in the article. It does appear to be the view of one poster on the primary source (Stormfront site), and as these sorts of posts (self published sources, forum posts, or blogs), aren't permitted to be used as sources, I feel this should be deleted. Steve Crossin (contact) 17:18, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per B and Steve Crossin. As well, searches on Yahoo, Microsoft and Google News return an equal paucity for the phrase "Independent National Socialism". Tabercil (talk) 20:41, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Patent nonsense. Article fails WP:RS, WP:V. A great deal of the article body is copied verbatim from internet forum postings. Sole cited source is the forums section at Stormfront's website. L0b0t (talk) 21:22, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.