Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Incidents (magazine)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 07:53, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incidents (magazine)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia:Notability (media). IamMM (talk) 16:20, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:59, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:10, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep. I've found two sources discussing the magazine and its banning by the Iranian government, such as the Human Rights Watch currently cited in the wiki article and page 25 of the Abdorrahman Boroumand Center for Human Rights in Iran. The Iranrights.org source also reveals the magazine was talked about in a testimony by Ali-Ashgar Ramenzanpour, a news director for Iran International, and reveals the magazine had 300,000 readers according to that testimony. Havades is also mentioned in this book as an example of the widespread banning of and violence against press under Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani's presidency. This is giving me a good sign, but other sources I've found in my searches use the word Havades for different things, not to discuss this magazine. If I lived in a Middle Eastern country (which I don't want to), more sources would probably come up about this topic, but I live in the US. 👨x🐱 (talk) 21:20, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:47, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per 👨x🐱. The very fact that this publication fell victim to Iranian regime's censorship is sufficient to establish its notability. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 19:11, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources and arguments above Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:54, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.