Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inartmedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete: about as blatant an advertisement as I have seen in Wikipedia for quite a while. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:40, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Inartmedia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

spam from Voidz. non notable company, lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. mix of pr and non reliable sources. I found nothing better. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:23, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.