Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In Search Of (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Foxy Loxy ^Pounce! 02:29, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In Search Of (film)[edit]

No notability asserted. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 04:47, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:CRYSTAL, WP:FUTURE, and/or WP:N. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 09:12, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 13:25, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Updating now, kasoda (talk) 09:52, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I feel I resolved the WP:CRYSTAL, WP:FUTURE, and WP:N issues. kasoda (talk) 03:31, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I just noticed it said Release Date: 11/01/08. How can this be a upcoming film if it already was released? Also, if the film is not notable yet, or not foreseeably notable, it should not have an article until it actually is released and shown notable (at least that's what happens usually). ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 05:21, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I removed the upcoming film tag, Sorry I missed that. What notable does it need? Are box office numbers ,reviews, magazine write-up not enough? Sorry very new to this. kasoda (talk) 05:48, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. FutureFilm tag not needed since the film has been screening. Is not WP:CRYSTAL. Is not WP:FUTURE. Have myself addressed format problems, sourced the article, done some expansion, some sourcing, and removed the advert feel of the synopsis. Its just tickling the bar of WP:NF.... just. I have tagged it for WP:RESCUE. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 09:38, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And a question: This source says "From Here To Awesome Winners Screen in London", and lists In Search Of as one of these winners. What was the award they won? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 09:44, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Asserts notability in current form, can see where notability could be debatable but IMO meets enough of the criteria in WP:NF to keep. Raitchison (talk) 16:54, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the references now seem to me sufficient to pass the notability guidelines. Terraxos (talk) 00:25, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.