Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In Defense of Global Capitalism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 01:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In Defense of Global Capitalism[edit]
- In Defense of Global Capitalism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Author's subject biography is nominated for deletion, on the basis of failing to meet criteria of notability. Further, as far as this particular article is concerned, a Timbro publication -- or any think tank publication, for that matter -- generally doesn't merit its own article as it's essentially a privately-funded publication, not an academic or even a commercial publication. This article exists as an artificial way to manufacture notability for the book. J.R. Hercules (talk) 03:04, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable publication on a notable think tank. The think tank itself has notable authors under it as well. Undeath (talk) 03:13, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, although we should have better documentation of the awards and reception. Like it or not this book is all the rage in the libertarian/economic-conservative community and it's trivial to find coverage. --Dhartung | Talk 05:04, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, definitely notable book that has been the subject of much debate and awards. /Slarre (talk) 06:52, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, notability is established. Janm67 (talk) 09:44, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep There appear from the books website to be reviews, but they need to be cited from the original publications involved. Awards are mentioned--but what are they? DGG (talk) 22:48, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.