Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InSite Bowling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:11, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

InSite Bowling[edit]

No Google News, Books or Scholar hits for this defunct company. Somewhere between 86 and 523 Google hits period. Deprodded. Joey the Mango (talk) 04:55, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:56, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:COMPANY. Google shows no signs of notability[1][2]. — Rankiri (talk) 13:58, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Company wasn't notable when it existed, but now that it has folded, it won't become notable any time soon. Niteshift36 (talk) 15:32, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: not influential during its existence. Now it's gone, barely leaving a trace, we can't see how it affected online bowling. Alexius08 (talk) 17:44, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence that the notability guidelines for inclusion have been met. Dawn Bard (talk) 17:35, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.