Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InCorp Services, Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 16:30, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

InCorp Services, Inc.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The articles does not meet the WP:GNG or WP:COMPANY guidelines for notability. The company's basis for notability seems to lie in the claim that it is the second largest registered agent in Nevada and the largest Nevada-based registered agent service. Through research, I've found that Nevada is a popular state for incorporation, but that fact still doesn't seem like justification for the company's inclusion in an encyclopedia. The article also relies exclusively on primary research and does not meet the WP:SOURCE guidelines. In looking for resources, I did find a book result of the company being listed as one of the Big Four registered agent companies (not sure even this would make the company notable), but the author, Jennifer Reuting, is one of the company's co-founders and her claim isn't based on any kind of visible research or statistic. I could find no published, reliable, secondary sources and I do not think any exist. EBstrunk18 (talk) 00:01, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 March 26. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 00:30, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 01:27, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 01:27, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete subject to later userfication. Right now, it would be very difficult to sort out reliable sources (and to add them) from the cruft of Google. Bearian (talk) 19:43, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Self-sourced and press releases only. Spinning Spark 15:38, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.