Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inés Marful

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:23, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Inés Marful[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN author - fails WP:AUTHOR UtherSRG (talk) 12:06, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Women, Sexuality and gender, and Spain. UtherSRG (talk) 12:06, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: award winning writer. PamD 07:50, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The award seems suspect. The article links no real references. Is it a notable award? Glman99 (talk) 14:23, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 13:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:18, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Found this review [1]. If another one can be found it perhaps be enough for WP:NAUTHOR. scope_creep^Talk 06:36, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just realised the same review in the article. I could find much else. scope_creep^Talk

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 05:29, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep beyond on what we already know, also note that the work Lorca y sus dobles: interpretación psicoanalítica de la obra dramática y dibujística has 31 citations on google scholar. For a humanities non-english work this is a huge number for google scholar. —siro χ o 06:58, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Unable to see not pass WP:NAUTHOR. Meegvun (talk) 08:29, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - On JSTOR, I found a review for the 209-page essay Lorca y sus dobles (and have added it to the article); based on a publisher bio (which in addition to biographical and career information includes, Google translated: "She is the author of the essay Lorca y sus dobles (Extraordinary Doctorate Award, which in its day was described as "the definitive work on the poet from Granada" (Manuel Alvar, Blanco y Negro)"), as well as the citation information offered above, this appears to be a notable work, and as noted above, another one of her works is reviewed in a scholarly journal. The potential for non-English sources to exist about this academic writer and award-winning novelist and her work has me further leaning keep. Beccaynr (talk) 22:14, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And I found a source about her after she won the 2008 Premio de Novela Casino de Mieres award for one of her novels: Marful recoge emocionada el premio del Casino de Mieres (El Comercio, 2008). Beccaynr (talk) 23:49, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.