Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imran Khan (cricketer, born 1991)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The arguments provided do not refute the claim that the article fails GNG. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 15:44, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Imran Khan (cricketer, born 1991)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, nothing in coverage. Störm (talk) 20:29, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:29, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:29, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:29, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: - I strongly believe it should be deleted because reliable sources are week and this article written just for advertisement purpose. TheDreamBoat (talk) 06:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Player has played 1 FC and 8 T20 matches passing him for WP:CRIC. Article needs improving and not deleting. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 17:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - as with a huge range of other AfDs, the correct standard is not WP:GNG, but WP:CRIN which is passed by virtue of playing List A cricket. DevaCat1 (talk) 17:50, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep played in LA and T20 matches, meeting WP:NCRIC. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 13:03, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete scorecards (the entire scope of referencing in the article) do not WP:GNG pass. SportingFlyer T·C 19:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the well reasoned arguments of Sportingflyer. I hope the closer recognizes that this is not cricketpedia, and the point of Wikipedia articles is not to gather the information from score cards.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:44, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No WP:SIGCOV, only wide-ranging databases consisting mostly of scorecards, so also fails WP:SPORTCRIT. The lack of sources, means we have prose synthesised from scorecards and mostly merely listing statistical detail. NCRIC is notoriously bad as presuming notability for cricketers such as these, with very few domestic T20 appearances and a solitary LA appearance (incidentally this one was in division 2 – and as such, not the "highest level"), and community consensus has shown that more is required than a trivial pass of SNG such as this. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 13:31, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.