Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Implicit collaboration (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus � DGG ( talk ) 04:44, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Implicit collaboration[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability: an article on non-notable "emergent discipline" possibly consisting entirely of original research. The artcile is cited to a book by non-notable authors and I cannot locate any other sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:25, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:54, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:54, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:15, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:29, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete based on quick look at Google Books. These two words are used together quite a bit, but not especially in the way talked about in this article. Seems to be neologism here, just two words in other places.Borock (talk) 18:42, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No real evidence that this is an "emergent discipline", or that it is worthy of note in an encyclopedia.TheBlueCanoe 02:51, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete perhaps by now every combination of two words has had someone write one or two articles declaring it to be the next big thing. Not notable until someone else notices it. W Nowicki (talk) 20:17, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.