Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Impeachment inquiry against Mike DeWine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Unanimous agreement that this doesn't belong in mainspace. Less clear which of the various alternatives is best, but draftify seems popular. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:42, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Impeachment inquiry against Mike DeWine[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A pretty obvious case of violating WP:NOTNEWS. Something that just happened yesterday and for now simply looks like a political stunt that is unlikely to lead anywhere. Seems doubtful that this stuff will even get a formal committee vote. If three months from now there is still some coverage of this topic, an article might be appropriate then. There is already a one-sentence mention of this impeachment attempt in the Mike DeWine article, which is more than sufficient under the current circumstances. Nsk92 (talk) 23:32, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Nsk92 (talk) 23:32, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Nsk92 (talk) 23:32, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move to draft, as there is nothing here that rises to the level of an article at this point. BD2412 T 23:34, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Draft Space Move. {Pointing out that a merge/move talk was in progress BEFORE this was suggested for deletion. I would discuss there} It was suggested earlier to be moved into a draft/user space. I can move it into a draft space and edit it/improve it. If something does happen, I can easily move it to a real article again OR add the information to Mike DeWine. I would vote on that instead of a 1 sentence merge right now. (Doubtful), but for all we know, he could be impeached and I would hate to have deleted the article and have to retype it. A draft is just as easy to delete OR make into an article depending on what happens. Anyone agree? Elijahandskip (talk) 00:20, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Concerned citizens can read OH news or OH government sites, especially for an event that happened yesterday. Caro7200 (talk) 23:43, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Again we are talking about the move/merge. That discussion was going on BEFORE the deletion was started. Please discuss there. Elijahandskip (talk) 23:44, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify until this becomes notable. Creator is on board with that. —valereee (talk) 23:54, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify Appears to be a stunt, but this could become something. Moving to draft seems like the best option. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 01:08, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Mike_DeWine#Impeachment_Inquiries_of_Mike_DeWine as should be typical for this sort of news. Not opposed to Draftifying/Userfying if desired, but let's not move it back for a while... — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 01:18, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or redirect. The subject doesn't need to be split off from the main Mike DeWine article. Neither article is so long as to need to spin this off as its own page. I'd be OK with draftifying as well. --Jayron 32 16:44, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Rhododendrites. This is a political stunt that is going nowhere at the speed of light. I would be shocked if long term this rates even a footnote in the governor's political bio. In the highly unlikely event this turns into more than a blip, we can always come back and restore the article. See also WP:NOTNEWS and WP:EVENT. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:15, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete clear political stunt with very little chance of ever coming to a vote.Juneau Mike (talk) 20:17, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.