Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Immo Blaese

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Darkwind (talk) 23:35, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Immo Blaese[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD, tag removed by page creator with no note on talk page or mention in edit summary. Non notability: fails WP:ARTIST There is a mention of an award, but this is merely something given to a team of which he was a member. All sources are self-published. TheLongTone (talk) 10:26, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I guess that article should be deleted according to the Wikipedia policies. Unfortunately the artist is successful but not in Wikipedia terms. Because I talked with the artist and he also told me that there is a misunderstanding of the D&AD award. So as the page creator I agree with the non-notability argument. Nanderovski (talk) 10:40, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buff bills 7701 00:28, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Although the article states that he participated in exhibits at major venues, these seem to have been purely as part of much larger teams, not enough to contribute to individual notability, and that's the only thing I see in the article that stands out. Probably this can be closed quickly as a G3 speedy given the article creator's statement above. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:25, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.