Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Immaculate Conception Cemetery (Oklahoma City)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Immaculate Conception Cemetery (Oklahoma City)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to identify significant, in depth coverage of this cemetery. Results are limited to genealogy sites and burial notices, nothing that covers the cemetery itself. Further unable to identify anything such as architect or planner that might confer notability. Star Mississippi 23:44, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 23:44, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 23:44, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is the old iron-fenced cemetery on Meridian Avenue close to the custom house. The oldest internments taking place in 1892, this is a comparatively old OKC burying ground, being established quickly after the run of 1889 first populated the newly opened sections to non-native settlers. Looking through the burials I see several early pioneers but don't see any encyclopedic figures. Newspapers.com nets us 196 bare mentions (in individual burials). Oklahoman archives the same quality. No easy help from local historical society websites. https://www.okcemeteries.net is a helpful site but not considered reliable (in any case the site was last updated in September '21). A reasonable WP:BEFORE gathers zero reliable sources we could use upon which to base an article about this cemetery. Specialty books or local histories may well be out there but they aren't apparent as of this date stamp. BusterD (talk) 00:49, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Very minimal amount of coverage found, fail's WP:GNG under significant coverage.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Lectrician2 (talk • contribs)
I'm the article creator and I'm fine with deleting this entry. No need to keep this discussion running! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 02:57, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Close per Another Believer. The article can be recreated if there is anything notable about the graveyard that is found. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 20:24, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacks significant coverage fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:36, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.