Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Immaculata Church

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Majorly (Talk) 13:43, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Immaculata Church[edit]

non notable, non verifiable per WP:CHURCH Adam Riley ^Talk 18:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually...it is notable and verifiable per WP:CHURCH (see item 3: "Churches which have verifiable historical or architectural significance are notable.") *Please do not delete article* — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.133.29.121 (talk • contribs)

There are talks about a "painted scroll" in the article, but that's the only significance. It is a pilgrimage church, yes, but there is nothing stating the significance of a pilgrimage church. --Адам Райли ^Talk 21:26, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep. It certainly has historical significance, having had a sizable German Catholic congregation dating from before the civil war. I found the German scroll interesting as a testament to (rather odd) attitudes of German Catholic immigrants in the 19th century. Though I normally have no interest in churches, I'd see this one if I were in the area, based on this article.

OinkOink 01:30, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Church is on the National Register of Historic Places since 1979.[1] Artwork covered in a scholarly work. Should be notable enough. --Dhartung | Talk 02:06, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Being a native Cincinnatian, I see annual local news coverage to the Good Friday step climbing from the Ohio River bank to high atop Mt. Adams, one of Cincinnati's oldest original neighborhoods. The church itself is known for being a historical landmark. - Gilliam 06:10, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a national historical place; artwork & long history. SkierRMH,09:00, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Stong Keep Definitely a notable church. Unfortunately, Adam Riley appears to be making a WP:POINT about churches, nominating many, many churches for deletion. Pastordavid 16:28, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.