Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imma be rocking that body

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 11:57, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Imma be rocking that body[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most music videos are not notable enough to have their own article, and this is one of them. Sufficient information is contained in or could be contained in Imma Be and Rock That Body. –Chase (talk) 22:04, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- --Rrburke^ekrubrR 22:19, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP Article is notable because it has several differnt styles in the song and it will be difficult to explain a ten-minute music video on the album page if it was merged/redirected. -- Kei_Jo (Talk to me baby! :þ) 00:17, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Paparazzi (Lady Gaga song) has a video just about as long and is adequately described there. My proposal isn't to merge or redirect this anywhere since as it involves two different main articles. –Chase (talk) 04:16, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I was unaware that "Imma Be" and "Rock That Body" were two different songs. -- Kei_Jo (Talk to me baby! :þ) 16:28, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 05:05, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Single that isn't enough. Cynof Gavuf 09:36, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Additional information can be added to the pages for imma be and rock that body Mydreamistofly (talk) 18:39, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think the article should be rewritten with just one line: " "Imma Be Rocking That Body" is a mix of Imma Be and Rock That Body. Please refer to these pages for more information." or something similar. Or maybe redirect to either one? -- Kei_Jo (Talk to me baby! :þ) 19:04, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's a music video, not an actual mash-up. Redirecting wouldn't be appropriate in this situation. –Chase (talk) 23:54, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Improve or delete Michael Jackson's Thriller has its own article, but has much more content and is quite notable. Imma Be and Rock That Body contain most of the information of Imma Be Rocking That Body. Adabow (talk) 08:33, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.