Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imagine: Animal Doctor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Imagine video games. Spartaz Humbug! 15:56, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Imagine: Animal Doctor[edit]

Imagine: Animal Doctor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article doesn't pass WP:GNG. None of the Imagine games are notable in themselves. Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 09:11, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 09:33, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I'm fully right in the middle between !Delete and !Keep here. There is an in-depth IGN review here: [1], Game Informer supposedly gave it a D (although I can't read it from the Google Books link) here: [2], and Nintendo Power supposedly also reviewed it as seen here [3]. There's a book that mentions it but in the context of the whole Imagine series here for being somewhat sexist as well: [4]. I think there's enough sources here to theoretically make a stub, but I don't see much more to hope for anything else. Nomader (talk) 20:20, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:04, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have no particular preference for redirect or delete and then redirect. Szzuk (talk) 08:14, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There is actually an article there, I'm not sure why it was moved to a redirect whilst the deletion process is in place. I have reverted this Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 07:41, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.