Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ImAllexx

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:32, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ImAllexx[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I noticed a notability tag on the article then proceeded to perform a WP:BEFORE which indicates that subject of the article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them as many of the sources observed are user generated thus aren’t reliable. Celestina007 (talk) 21:15, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:15, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:15, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:15, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:15, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lacks the level of coverage needed to justify having an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:23, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete zero coverage in RS. Awful sourcing for a BLP. Spicy (talk) 09:10, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not meet wp standards for notability. 2603:7000:2143:8500:284F:1640:953:7AA8 (talk) 07:27, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I was surprised when I did a BEFORE and nothing in the way of RS came up. Does not meet GNG. --Kbabej (talk) 17:39, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.