Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ilyas Ayubov

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:49, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ilyas Ayubov[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find sufficient indicia of notability of this person in RS sources. Others are welcome to try. Epeefleche (talk) 16:54, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean, "RS sources"? RS stands for reliable sources, so you're saying "reliable sources sources"! On a more relevant note, delete unless a Heymann standard improvement is made.--Laun chba ller 17:15, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Launch. I'm using "RS" as an adjective, to refer to the level of reliability of the source. The same way it is used in these 700+ instances.--Epeefleche (talk) 17:19, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good lord, that is unbelievable! I still say that it is grammatically incorrect, even if many others do not.--Laun chba ller 17:24, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You will find (to your apparent chagrin) usage encompasses such adjectives all over the project ... as in FA article, GA article, etc.--Epeefleche (talk) 17:32, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disgusting. What next, a reliable RS?--Laun chba ller 17:36, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is the grammar of the nomination statement relevant to the deletion debate? —Tom Morris (talk) 21:14, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:01, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:01, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 21:14, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.