Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ill Repute

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:47, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ill Repute[edit]

This band is not notable, and there are no sources at all. Dave Foster (talk) 05:20, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, nonsense nomination, the band is clearly notable. A quick search finds coverages in the mainstream media as well as albums under major record labels in prominent stores. The article needs help but this is no reason to delete. Rasadam (talk) 09:31, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep, seems to meet WP:MUSIC, although frankly not by much: a lot of independent releases, being reckoned one of the leaders of the "nardcore" scene, and this piece from the SF Weekly just push it over, for me. --Stormie (talk) 10:32, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:10, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:MUSIC#C1. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 23:49, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.