Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ilan Shavit-Stricks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:00, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ilan Shavit-Stricks[edit]

Ilan Shavit-Stricks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability. Article was written by an account that appears to be connected to the individual. Jprg1966 (talk) 00:09, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment All references in the article are by the subject not about the subject; in addition several were presented as being from The Economist rather than Calcalist (now changed). This is floating on the edge of being an unsourced BLP; I am finding nothing about the subject other than role listings relative to his job, but possibly someone equipped to search Hebrew media can establish firmer foundations for the article. AllyD (talk) 08:42, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:55, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per lack of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 20:00, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.