Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ike Lozada

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, nominator blocked as a sock and no one else argued for deletion (WP:SKCRIT#4). (non-admin closure) Elli (talk | contribs) 01:25, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ike Lozada[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Person. Article contains zero source. As for WP:BEFORE, theres nothing can be found about this topic, which it fails WP:GNG. VladimirBoys (talk) 22:02, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:36, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:36, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Couldn't blame you on WP:BEFORE. This guy's career was from 1954 to 1993, just a year before internet in the Philippines was a thing. Howard the Duck (talk) 01:54, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing to be found about this topic? What happens when you click on the word "books" above? And I note that the nominator tried to change the comment above to say "delete". Clear battleground behaviour, rather than a good-faith attempt to see whether this article meets our criteria for deletion. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:16, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per above reasons. He meets the minimum requirements for actors: "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." And as pointed out above, there are numerous sources about him. I would also like here to suggest to the nominator to please familiarize themselves with Wikipedia's guidelines on Notability. An article having "no source" is not a legitimate justification for proposing it for deletion. There are numerous stub articles on Wikipedia. Proposing an article for deletion on the basis that the subject is not notable has its own requirements and "the article not having enough sources for my liking" is not one of them. Koikefan (talk) 00:53, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.