Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ijegun
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Complete Keep Consensus determined by the WP:GEOLAND policy. (non-admin closure) AmericanAir88(talk) 22:49, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Ijegun[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ijegun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
this page should be deleted because I don’t think it is notable enough or not needed for inclusion in Wikipedia Sdusty (talk) 23:22, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - Numerous sources found via Google search, just needs a lot of work. Jdcomix (talk) 23:26, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Mccapra (talk) 23:50, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 00:41, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep WP:GEOLAND Mahveotm (talk) 21:20, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:57, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:GEOLAND.4meter4 (talk) 15:04, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - a simple online search before nomination would have found many good sources about this place. Bearian (talk) 18:57, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.