Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ignite films

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Fram (talk) 14:45, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ignite films[edit]

Contested prod. No assertion of notability, no reliable sources AndrewHowse (talk) 21:49, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful The article was originally about a different "Ignite Films" and here somebody highjacked the article. Matchups (talk) 21:56, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Interesting. I don't think either article passes WP:N or WP:RS ! --AndrewHowse (talk) 22:07, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 22:40, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I'd say Ignite films (Holland) should have been speedied a long time ago. Ignite films (Canada) definitely fails WP:N as it asserts none. Also, not verbatim, but smells like {{advert}}. -- Emana (Talk) 22:52, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Companies has been informed of this ongoing discussion. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 12:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there are no reliable sources to establish notability for the Canadian company nor the Dutch company. So regardless of which version of the article is under consideration, notability is not met. -- Whpq (talk) 16:56, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No reliable sources to establish notability -- pb30<talk> 03:59, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.