Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ignatius Arry Sy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete per G-11 unambiguous advertising or promotion.. (non-admin closure) -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:53, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ignatius Arry Sy[edit]

Ignatius Arry Sy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats):
Ignatius Arry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are two articles on the same person, both written by that person himself (wp:autobiography). The articles lack reliable sources. Although Google gives some results for this person, I think that he fails WP:MUSBIO. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:15, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: Ignatius Arry deleted per WP:CSD#G7 at author's request. JohnCD (talk) 10:42, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Auto bio of non notable individual so heavily embellished that it is now a hoax. Subject lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:11, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar  17:06, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 12:43, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as purely promotional with no neutral version in the page history (WP:CSD#G11). QVVERTYVS (hm?) 11:26, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete What's a Shorty Award? If it were somehow notable, the subject would have a slim chance of notability. It's not. Nothing else comes close to supporting the subject's notability. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:40, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fails to establish notability, self-promotion. Much of the article consists of narration of the article's subject about himself. Delete. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 15:58, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.