Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ifyoulove.net

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. The Placebo Effect (talk) 17:18, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ifyoulove.net[edit]

non notable website Christoph StSmith (talk) 09:41, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Borderline WP:CSD#G11 as platant pomp and advertising for the site. Also barely asserts any notability. Pedro : Chat 10:34, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:WEB. Lankiveil (talk) 10:39, 3 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Delete, fails WP:WEB, borderline spam. The only contributions from the user who created the article seem to be the creation of the article and adding references to the site in other articles. -- Redfarmer (talk) 10:59, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I (the writer of the initial article) don't believe it qualifies as spam, and would particularly like to draw attention to the few before me who have mentioend that it is 'borderline.' Also, just a bit of clarification (in response to Redfarmer), I took a quick look at the History, and there's one IP that added a modification/reference, which was not me. Doing a WhoIS on the IP shows it is a Canadian IP. Just wanted to clarify. Cheers! (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 00:34, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 02:22, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:WEB - use of some of the language feels like advertising; as in "Ifyoulove.net is unique.." Kavanagh21 (talk) 16:46, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll fix up the language if you feel it's like advertising. Can I ask for a little more time to clean it up? -- LoremIpsumDolorSitAmet (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 19:10, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - To be honest, I don't think that, even with rewriting, it could be argued that this site passes WP:WEB; sorry, but personally I'm going to stick with Delete. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kavanagh21 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.