Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ifunpix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 00:45, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ifunpix[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about an application which has not been the subject of significant discussion in reliable, third-party sources: fails WP:N. Likely created as an ad. No notability asserted, yet it doesn't fall within any of the CSD A7 criteria. Them From Space 21:14, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 22:05, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable, no reliable third-party coverage. Haakon (talk) 02:16, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete References include download sites, indicating the article authors clearly do not understand the separation between encyclopedic topics and routine. Miami33139 (talk) 00:16, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.