Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Idjaza

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ijazah. ✗plicit 14:47, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Idjaza[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is a lower-quality duplication of Ijazah. A merger has previously been proposed, but comparing the body and sourcing of the two articles, I do not think there is much to be salvaged on this page. All of the sources are obscure, Arabic-language titles, while the existing Ijazah page is already well-fleshed out in prose from largely credible, English-language, scholarly sources. The table that appears on both articles should probably not even exist. This page should become an alternative spelling redirect. Iskandar323 (talk) 13:27, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Religion, and Islam. Iskandar323 (talk) 13:27, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect: This is a lower-quality duplication of Ijazah and should redirect to that page. --Whiteguru (talk) 01:34, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per nom. Mccapra (talk) 02:33, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and speedy close this nomination per WP:SNOW. There's nothing worth discussing. ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 00:03, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.