Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Idea economy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:37, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Idea economy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is incoherent. It only has 2 references, one to a NYT article on patent trolling and another to a conference called "Ideas Economy". From the references I don't think Idea or Ideas Economy is an actual term rather just the name of an article and the name of a conference Bhny (talk) 07:28, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete per WP:NEOLOGISM. Articles of this type can probably be developed with a few spotty sources that mention "ideas" and "economics", but we're trying to write articles about established knowledge, not summaries of opinion pieces and how some hot jargon is used and misused. Go ahead and redirect this to an article about economics if someone finds a suitable target. Vcessayist (talk) 00:30, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not enough sources for the claim to be an economic concept --Anbu121 (talk me) 21:46, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per the abovementioned reasons. CeesBakker (talk) 11:21, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.