Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iconicles (series 1)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 18:05, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Iconicles (series 1)[edit]
- Iconicles (series 1) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no indication of WP:notability of this series. No article currently exists for the program so its a bit premature to create an article for a particular series. Prod removed without explanation. Article has already been speedy deleted once. noq (talk) 10:13, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:12, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as lacking independent third party sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:54, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 16:32, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 02:13, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Ghits are primary and routine listings, plus a couple of routine industry notices that BBC had bought the show. "Was once on TV" does not, by itself, give the subject sufficient notability. The closest I could find to a review was this highly negative forum exchange. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 03:29, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.