Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Icebird (Transformers)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is tha tthis character is not notable. Courcelles 00:07, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Icebird (Transformers)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable and obscure fictional character. Delete. NotARealWord (talk) 15:59, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge to Mutants - Problem with merging this character is he isn't a Maximal or Predacon, and there isn't a page for the Beast Wars toy line. Perhaps we need a page for the Beast Wars toy line to have a list of the toys. THEN we can merge all the minor character into it. Mathewignash (talk) 16:05, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Do we really need redirects for obscure, irrelevant characters? NotARealWord (talk) 16:12, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This request by Mathewignash to continually suggest for mergers of poorly written transformers articles is ridiculous. They are normally obscure characters which are highly unlikely to be searched for so I vote Delete. Dwanyewest (talk) 17:13, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Too big to merge and is a character in multiple media. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 19:23, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I don't get your argument. It's not like we need all this information. Keeping an article on this subject here is like indiscriminately collecting information. Which is not what Wikipedia is meant for. Also, I'm pretty sure this topic fails Wikipedia:Notability considering that Serpentera and Emperor Zurg sure didn't pass. NotARealWord (talk) 20:08, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/delete It might be one of the more notable characters in the series, but it really does not look like it is notable enough to actually deserve a separate page. Nergaal (talk) 22:25, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment- Notable in the series? Not even close. NotARealWord (talk) 13:10, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This character is not notable within the series and definately not the subject of independent verifiable secondary writings. Who the fuck is Icebird anyhow? Fuck this shit, this shit is making wikipedia look foolish. Donald Schroeder JWH018 (talk) 18:46, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails the general notability guideline because there is no reliable independent coverage. Blest Withouten Match (talk) 20:18, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no notability, no significant coverage in reliable independent sources. This stuff should be on a transformers wikia. --Cameron Scott (talk) 18:26, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No real-world notability asserted for a fictional character. Tarc (talk) 02:13, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no third-party sources to WP:verify notability of this character in any form of media. Shooterwalker (talk) 19:41, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete agree with scott, tarc and shooterwalker.Bali ultimate (talk) 23:47, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.