Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ice in Beverages
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 02:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ice in Beverages[edit]
- Ice in Beverages (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Should be deleted, or if needed, merged into Ice cube Calvin 1998 Talk Contribs 19:34, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Agree with nominator. Malinaccier (talk) 19:26, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If you think it should be merged, why did you take it to AfD? This is Articles for Deletion, not Articles for Merging. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:30, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply Well, it's topic is already discussed fully at Ice cube, I was just stating merge was a possibility. Calvin 1998 Talk Contribs 19:34, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nothing to merge. Calvin was trying to "an ice guy". I was expecting something about the history of ice in beverages, or the cultural differences between Americans and Brits on use of ice (over there, I understand, they have tongs to place a single cube into a beverage). This article doesn't hold water, not in any form. Mandsford (talk) 19:41, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Your comments had me laughing out loud. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:42, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree, nothing to merge here. Content is already covered in other articles. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:43, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Redundant with ice cube. --Wtshymanski (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 21:20, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. and Mandsford. JohnCD (talk) 21:24, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as there is no content to merge that isn't already there. Pharmboy (talk) 23:41, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.