Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ibex (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:39, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ibex (band)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is not inherited. The band is already mentioned on the Mercury page. No releases or otherwise notable under the citeria of WP:MUSIC. Page has no citations. Karst (talk) 12:18, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would references make it keepable? Happy to track them down (it all came from a web search, iirc) if useful. Stevage 23:38, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:33, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to Stevage. Yes, references makes all the differences in the world. They would need to indicate stand alone notability, however. So far everything indicates this bands connection to Queen (or at least Freddy Mercury), which seems the proper place for this information. ShelbyMarion (talk) 16:48, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 23:59, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:16, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.