Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Wannamaker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 09:18, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ian Wannamaker[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable hockey player. No evidence he meets the GNG, fails WP:HOCKEY and WP:GNG. AaronWikia (talk) 20:09, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. AaronWikia (talk) 20:16, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. AaronWikia (talk) 20:16, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. AaronWikia (talk) 20:16, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. AaronWikia (talk) 20:16, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets point 2. from WP:NHOCKEY Played one or more games in an amateur league considered, through lack of a professional league, the highest level of competition extant by playing in NZIHL as well as playing for New Zealand National Team even if it wasn't in the top pool for World Championship, I think between the two things it is enough for him to have a page. NZ Footballs Conscience^(talk) 01:21, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. The New Zealand League is not considered a professional league of the caliber to satisfy point 2 (see WP:NHOCKEY/LA; "highest level of competition extant" means in the world, not in a country). Also, the consensus has long been established that it has to be in the top level for the World Championship to satisfy point 6 (which NHOCKEY explicitly states). Ravendrop 06:56, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the league he plays in is not high enough to satisfy the notability requirements.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:59, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 06:24, 30 July 2017 (UTC) Delete As per nom. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 06:24, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete GNG. DerbyCountyinNZ Your !vote got duplicated somehow. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 00:23, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Beats me how that happened! DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 04:09, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.