Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Smith (Councillor)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 20:57, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ian Smith (Councillor)[edit]
- Ian Smith (Councillor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Falls well short of the requirements set out at WP:POLITICIAN Nuttah (talk) 08:33, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - With greatest respect to Mr Smith, this article fails WP:POLITICIAN #3 as "an elected local official". In the alternative, the article fails the general notability guidlines - there is no significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of this article.--Shirt58 (talk) 11:15, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. He's the leader of the opposition on a council, which is a better claim than any old councillor, but I can't find any coverage beyond soundbites on behalf of his party. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 16:55, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:01, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.