Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian S. Ardern

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:33, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ian S. Ardern[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable subject that fails WP:BASIC notability standards. Searches for independent, reliable sources with significant coverage have provided nothing. Coverage found consists of fleeting passing mentions, name checks and brief quotations, none of which establish notability. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:17, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:18, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:18, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:18, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete possibly a very important person in the church but I can find no good independent sources. fails WP:BASIC. (Dushan Jugum (talk) 02:55, 1 February 2019 (UTC)).[reply]
Delete Undersourced and not enough web coverage despite well known important person in the Church community, as I agree with User:Dushan Jugum. Sheldybett (talk) 05:34, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: agree with above, BLP concerns arise about the lack of sourcing. Potentially notable, but source searches on Google and WorldCat turn up little. SITH (talk) 14:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.