Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian "The Stewart Spencer" Adams
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. A7 Tone 21:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ian "The Stewart Spencer" Adams[edit]
- Ian "The Stewart Spencer" Adams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable boxer; doesn't seem to pass WP:ATHLETE. --Dynaflow babble 02:02, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete There is no indication of any possible importance. DGG (talk) 02:29, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I am directly related to Ian Adams, I am his nephew. This is true. But, do you have any proof to say that is not true? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Welshboy'o (talk • contribs)
- Sorry, but that is not exactly how things work around here. The verifiability policy requires people to prove information is true, rather than the other way around. Also, the nominator didn't say it was not true. He cited the WP:ATHLETE guidelines. - Mgm|(talk) 11:53, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- [edit conflict/ditto to Welshboy'o] Actually, it's the other way around. There are two Wikipedia inclusion criteria at issue here: the Wikipedia:Notability guideline, which requires that articles assert their subjects' notability, and Wikipedia:Verifiability, a core policy which demands that claims made in articles (including claims to notability) be backed up by cited outside sources. In other words, it is up to the author(s) of an article to prove that their subjects are as encyclopedically significant as they claim they are. --Dynaflow babble 11:57, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, but that is not exactly how things work around here. The verifiability policy requires people to prove information is true, rather than the other way around. Also, the nominator didn't say it was not true. He cited the WP:ATHLETE guidelines. - Mgm|(talk) 11:53, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I am directly related to Ian Adams, I am his nephew. This is true. But, do you have any proof to say that is not true? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Welshboy'o (talk • contribs)
Is there any proof this isn't true. I am the nephew of Ian Adams. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.168.186.95 (talk) 19:31, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.