Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I see danger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 18:30, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see danger[edit]

Nothing on IMDB, or anywhere else. StaticGull Talk 14:29, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This might have even qualified for a speedy delete. Don't be afraid to use those tags. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 14:32, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete if notability is not verified using reliable sources. --Evb-wiki (talk) 14:34, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not appear on Google, nor do the names of those listed as creators of the short. Does not appear to have any notability whatsoever. And what is an ECM Award??Wikigonish (talk) 15:03, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Exactly! (see below) Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:44, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 18:43, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Either a hoax or stunningly non-notable. Nothing outside Wikipedia [1][2]. PC78 (talk) 18:46, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to notability not being established. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 18:51, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and I also suspect possible hoax. --Quartermaster (talk) 19:26, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless reliable sources can be provided to establish notability and verify the facts stated. Wiw8 (talk) 20:53, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article asserts notability, but with the article totally unsourced, it in no way supports the claim. There is an ECM Record Label. But many different companies at many different locations have many different ECM Awards: [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], etc., but none seem to have an award so named that could be given to a horror short film. This all comes back to we don't have any idea what this ECM means. IMHO opinion, this is likely a student film and the filmaker is proud of her award... but even were the award to be proven, there is nothing else anywhere that proves a notability. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:44, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and Evb-wiki: WP:N, WP:V and WP:RS. Cliff smith ^talk 22:50, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I see deletion. JBsupreme (talk) 07:00, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.