Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Want to Protect You

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 02:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I Want to Protect You[edit]

I Want to Protect You (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG. Should be merged deleted. If desired, the namespace could be redirected to the album Useless Trinkets: B-Sides, Soundtracks, Rarities and Unreleased 1996–2006 or Eels (band). Binksternet (talk) 04:51, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. AfD is not the place to propose a merge. --Michig (talk) 05:59, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Sorry, what I meant was the article should be deleted. Then the namespace could be redirected to something relevant, if desired. Binksternet (talk) 14:34, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:43, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:16, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:16, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:44, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - The song on it's own is not notable. I have no objection to redirecting the name space to somewhere more appropriate. - Pmedema (talk) 15:14, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as nothing for its own notable article. SwisterTwister talk 19:05, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.