Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Left my Wallet in Cafe Nero
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Luigi30 (Ταλκ το mε) 14:11, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I Left my Wallet in Cafe Nero[edit]
No Vote - This article was listed for speedy deletion and I can't find any proof that the movies exists. It links to a disambiguation page for the author and a subway stop that looks questionable. Did the subway stop exist? Is it named after this move maker? The only person on the disambig page looks American, not British. -Tεxτurε 19:59, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete and, if it qualifies somehow, speedy deletion. A non-notable movie by a non-notable film maker does not meet the criteria to be a page on WP. The article does not even attempt to assert notability in any way. And did I mention that Googling the title produces zero hits? -- Kicking222 20:05, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete student film by schoolkid, and judging by the grade it says he got for it a fairly average one at that (A-level grades go from A to E) - from the article: "he recieved a C at A level for the masterpiece" -- AJR | Talk 20:42, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't Delete this is a article on the film entitled I left my wallet in cafe nero, doesn't wikipedia allow aspiring directors there rightful place in an internet-based encylopedia? Mark Lane is a critically acclaimed director in england, for his unique and deliberate dives into the human psyche. I don't see a problem with an independant film makers films being placed on here, As for the google reference above, it is an independant film, fans of the director and his films talk alot about it on forums mainly, however im sure a few fan sites will be popping up soon, so keep on the look out. -- TheDim 22:38, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment No. No one has a "rightful place" here. Wikipedia is not myspace. If, at some point in the future, the film is commercially released and receives public attention, it may be eligible. Fan1967 21:58, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- And that's for values of talking about it a lot which exclude any forums indexed by Google (i.e. most of them). Just zis Guy you know? 17:18, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as WP:NFT Just zis Guy you know? 21:54, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and re-tagged per A7. Contest of speedy deletion is not a reason to eliminate the speedy deletion template.Oh, by the way, no, the disambig page does not mention the director at all. TheProject 06:28, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Well, I guess I'm just learning about the speedy deletion process. Films don't qualify, I see. I still don't understand why A7 doesn't apply to companies, though. Change vote to strong delete. TheProject 17:08, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Elf-friend 08:20, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, first notability, then Wikipedia. -- ReyBrujo 21:13, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete. Vanity page. Consequentially 22:28, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.