Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I & K Motors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete did not assert notability, in addition to COI, SOCK & other concerns. SkierRMH (talk) 20:47, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I & K Motors[edit]

Delete (as nom): Fails to assert notability, was CSD'd but contested by author. — xaosflux ^Talk 14:41, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - company's notability not established, seems like an advert to me --Mhking (talk) 14:44, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. CSD A7 still applies to this version of the article: notability not established. --Blanchardb-^{MeMyEarsMyMouth}-timed 14:51, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, A7 No notability asserted that I can see. Possible WP:COI issues to boot--author's name is TheStephenator (talk · contribs), and the dealership is owned by a guy named Steve Innes. I suspect there's also some sockpuppetry going on with this article as well--Innes2k7 (talk · contribs) tried to add this company to List of Scottish companies.Blueboy 96 15:01, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And he just admitted that he's a sock. Blueboy 96 15:10, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete No assertion of notability whatsoever plus subject fails WP:CORP —Travis ^talk 16:53, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability is neither asserted nor present. Accounting4Taste:talk 19:00, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.