Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITunes Originals — Keith Urban
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 07:19, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
ITunes Originals — Keith Urban[edit]
- ITunes Originals — Keith Urban (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Per precedent, iTunes Originals albums are not notable. This one doesn't seem any different from the others — no reliable secondary sources, no third-party reviews, etc. Only source is a link to iTunes store, no secondary sources found. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:21, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep: All that I can find for significant coverage is [1] and [2]. Joe Chill (talk) 20:25, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep Joe Chill's articles look to me like significant coverage. It's not much, but I think it's enough keep the article. Despite the general idea that iTunes Originals albums are usually not notable, this one looks like an exception. Timmeh 20:16, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:17, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply] - Keep per Joe Chill's diggings-up. Wiwaxia (talk) 01:29, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as there seems enough coverage of this, and the inclusion of several new songs seems to merit the independent status of the release. --Glantrischmozzle (talk) 04:31, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep There is a fair amount of coverage. I agree with Timmeh. Btilm 05:32, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.