Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITunes Originals – Black Eyed Peas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 19:08, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ITunes Originals – Black Eyed Peas[edit]

It's a compilation album made up by iTunes. I don't think this is notable enough for its own article. Also, the infobox states it is a studio album which is a fabrication. GARDEN 10:09, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep generally, most iTO albums are notable. Doubly so given it's the BEPs. Sceptre ^(talk) 11:25, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What is the assumption "most iTO albums are notable" based on? - Mgm|^(talk) 11:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Aren't they just collections of previous songs? GARDEN 11:53, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They're official and endorsed releases, normally containing two or three re-recordings of songs per release. Most if not all also contain interviews with the band. Sceptre ^(talk) 17:25, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, ok then. I'll leave this open, though. GARDEN 18:11, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete While there is no doubt that the origional album is notable, this rerelease is not notable beyond the notability gained from the origional release. In other words, there would have to be sufficient criticism on the ITunes Originals version for this article to exist beyond the article on the album itself. If there is a review in the Rolling Stone that talks about the difference between the two or something to make the two distinct, then I would be wrong. But I did not gather a hint of original notability from the article itself. Mrathel (talk) 19:01, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: insufficient independent 3rd party notability. JamesBurns (talk) 01:42, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:25, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
delete not enough sources. Descíclope (talk) 15:31, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.